Re: [SECURITY] FDs 0, 1, 2 for SUID/SGID programs

From: Chris Wright (chris@wirex.com)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 11:12:00 EST

Next message: Johan Adolfsson: "[PATCH and RFC] Compact time in cramfs"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
In reply to: Alex Riesen: "Re: [SECURITY] FDs 0, 1, 2 for SUID/SGID programs"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [SECURITY] FDs 0, 1, 2 for SUID/SGID programs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Alex Riesen (Alexander.Riesen@synopsys.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:18:19PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > and clone-on-exec file descriptors across execve(). However, there
>
> that is close-on-exec. Different semantics.

yes, typo. thanks.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Johan Adolfsson: "[PATCH and RFC] Compact time in cramfs"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: Suggestion re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree"
In reply to: Alex Riesen: "Re: [SECURITY] FDs 0, 1, 2 for SUID/SGID programs"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [SECURITY] FDs 0, 1, 2 for SUID/SGID programs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 22:00:35 EST