On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:44:23PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> As for the binary compatibility... as long as we are source-compatible
> (i.e. keep ->read_inode2 and provide a compatible iget4()) - compatibility
> is not a problem. Anyone who ships binary-only modules is playing in the
> traffic and if they become a roadkill - it's Not Our Problem(tm). Think
> of it as evolution in action...
We need to keep iget4, but I don't think keeping ->read_inode2 source
compatiblitly is needed, it always was marked as a reiserfs cludge and
no one was supposed to use it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 12:00:16 EST