On Sun, 12 May 2002, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> I used to read the hand written changelogs, they only used to be a half
> page or so; neatly summerising stuff into one line; I can't be bothered
> with the full changelogs - they are obviously useful; but the hand
> written half pages are still a lot easier at a quick glance to see if
> there is anything that affects you.
Yeah, I know. Some people like the long ones, though, and they _are_
useful if you want to get a more detailed view.
I definitely don't want to maintain a separate set of short logs, but the
answer may be to just do both: have the existing long log (with no merging
of changesets, so that people see the actual commit boundaries), and a
separate "short" version that also merges the thing.
As an example, if the long version looks like this:
<jsimmons@heisenberg.transvirtual.com>
A bunch of fixes.
<jsimmons@heisenberg.transvirtual.com>
Pmac updates
<jsimmons@heisenberg.transvirtual.com>
Some more small fixes.
<rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
[PATCH] 2.5.13: vmalloc link failure
The following patch fixes this, and also fixes the similar problem in
scsi_debug.c:
...
The short version could look like
jsimmons@heisenberg.transvirtual.com:
A bunch of fixes.
Pmac updates
Some more small fixes.
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk:
[PATCH] 2.5.13: vmalloc link failure
...
ie only take the first line, and merge entries with the same author.
Perl people, stand up.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 12:00:19 EST