Re: Compact Flash bug

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Mon May 13 2002 - 16:45:44 EST

On Mon, 13 May 2002, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

| On Mon, 13 May 2002 Phillip.Watts@nlynx.com wrote:
|
| > in 2.4.18 the routine which is determining if Compact Flash
| > has Sandisk spelled SunDisk.
|
| That looks correct. The company seems to have problems with identity:
|
| # hdparm -i /dev/hda
|
| /dev/hda:
|
| Model=SunDisk SD35B-64, FwRev=vcb 1.45, SerialNo=MT311213748
| Config={ HardSect NotMFM Fixed DTR>10Mbs nonMagnetic }
| RawCHS=490/8/32, TrkSize=0, SectSize=576, ECCbytes=4
| BuffType=DualPort, BuffSize=1kB, MaxMultSect=1, MultSect=1
| CurCHS=490/8/32, CurSects=125440, LBA=yes, LBAsects=125440
| IORDY=no
| PIO modes: pio0 pio1
| DMA modes:
| AdvancedPM=no
|
| (that's a traditional 3.5" ATA flash device).

Yes, the company changed its name (at the urging of Sun IIRC). 

-- 
~Randy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 12:00:21 EST