On Tue, May 14 2002, Neil Conway wrote:
> On the serialisation issue: what does serialisation of the queues with
> respect to each other mean to you? I understand it to mean that we
> won't ever call the request_fn of both queues at the same time - because
> that's all the actual spinlock buys you. It does not IIUC mean that you
> can't get a call to request_fn of one queue while the other queue has
> lots of requests in it (which are potentially being serviced by DMA).
Bingo, this is exactly right and makes the point a hell of a lot better
than I did in my previous mail. Shared locks will only buy you that
noone fiddles with one list while the other is busy (ie nothing for us).
To really serialize operations the queue _must_ be shared with whoever
requires serialiation.
If not, the problem will have to be solved at the IDE level, not the
block level. And that has not looked pretty in the past.
-- Jens Axboe- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 14 2002 - 12:00:23 EST