Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Wed May 29 2002 - 08:44:28 EST

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: A reply on the RTLinux discussion."
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: Kernel deadlock using nbd over acenic driver"
In reply to: Christopher E. Brown: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Next in thread: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:44:52AM -0600, Christopher E. Brown wrote:
> > k6-3 == k6-2
> IIRC (not looking at the datasheets) there were some pretty nice
> improvements made to the core in the K6 to K6-2 update (not just and
> upclock and downsize, real changes(isn't this when they added MMX
> too?)).

original k6 had mmx. k6-2 brought 3dnow.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: A reply on the RTLinux discussion."
Previous message: Jens Axboe: "Re: Kernel deadlock using nbd over acenic driver"
In reply to: Christopher E. Brown: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Next in thread: rwhron@earthlink.net: "Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 31 2002 - 22:00:25 EST