Re: [Q] kbuild-2.5: inside or outside Makefile

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@ngforever.de)
Date: Sat Jun 01 2002 - 06:49:47 EST

Next message: Urban Widmark: "Re: [PATCH] fix VIA Rhine time outs (some)"
Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "[Q] kbuild-2.5: inside or outside Makefile"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "[Q] kbuild-2.5: inside or outside Makefile"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> You requested piecemeal of kbuild-2.5, and I'm currently hashing it. Thus
> one question: someone mentioned to migrate current kbuild-2.4 to
> kbuild-2.5, while Kaos' version suggests to at first have a separate
> Makefile-2.5.
>
> Which do you prefer now? Shall I have it into the current Makefile, or in
> a separate Makefile-2.5?

Another suggestion: have a Makefile-2.4 and a Makefile-2.5, then symlink
to which one is getting used.

> <URL:ftp://luckynet.dynu.com/pub/linux/kbuild-2.5/>

Regards,
Thunder

-- ship is leaving right on time | Thunder from the hill at ngforever empty harbour, wave goodbye | evacuation of the isle | free inhabitant not directly caveman's paintings drowning | belonging anywhere

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Urban Widmark: "Re: [PATCH] fix VIA Rhine time outs (some)"
Previous message: Thunder from the hill: "[Q] kbuild-2.5: inside or outside Makefile"
In reply to: Thunder from the hill: "[Q] kbuild-2.5: inside or outside Makefile"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:00:10 EST