Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Sun Jun 09 2002 - 04:46:38 EST

Next message: Skip Ford: "[PATCH] Unresolved symbol - vmalloc"
Previous message: Peter Wächtler: "Re: Process-Shared Mutex (futex) - What is it good for ?"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal"
Reply: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 03:09:44AM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:

> There has been talk of removing __KERNEL__ usage from
> some of the header files.

Where? If anything we need to increase __KERNEL__ usage in headers.
We export far too much crap which makes no sense to userspace.

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Skip Ford: "[PATCH] Unresolved symbol - vmalloc"
Previous message: Peter Wächtler: "Re: Process-Shared Mutex (futex) - What is it good for ?"
In reply to: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal"
Next in thread: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal"
Reply: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [patch] fat/msdos/vfat crud removal"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:13 EST