device_suspend() / device_resume() on S1?

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Sat Jun 08 2002 - 16:40:34 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface"
Previous message: Athanasius: "Re: kernel: request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 11"
Next in thread: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [ACPI] device_suspend() / device_resume() on S1?"
Reply: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [ACPI] device_suspend() / device_resume() on S1?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

Should we do device_suspend / device_resume on acpi S1 transition?

Con: It is not needed according to specs.

Con: It is more complicated that way.

Pro: Many buggy notebooks will probably need it.
Pavel

-- 
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly.  However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface"
Previous message: Athanasius: "Re: kernel: request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 11"
Next in thread: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [ACPI] device_suspend() / device_resume() on S1?"
Reply: Ducrot Bruno: "Re: [ACPI] device_suspend() / device_resume() on S1?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:14 EST