Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:49:02 -0700,
> Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> >Keith Owens wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:17:27 -0700,
> >> Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> >> > The st_ctime and st_mtime fields of a file that is mapped with MAP_SHARED
> >> > and PROT_WRITE shall be marked for update at some point in the interval
> >> > between a write reference to the mapped region and the next call to msync() with
> >> > MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC for that portion of the file by any process. If there is
> >> > no such call and if the underlying file is modified as a result of a write reference,
> >> > then these fields shall be marked for update at some time after the write reference.
> >>
> >> That says nothing about a file where the only updates are via mmap. My
> >> file had grown to its final size so there were no more writes, only
> >> pages being dirtied via mmap.
> >
> >It is specifically referring to updates via mmap! "a write reference
> >to the mapped region". This is the mmap documentation.
>
> I saw "write reference" and my brain translated that to "write()". I
> blame the long weekend.
That'll be a left-brain/write-brain thing.
I think it's too late to fix this in 2.4. If we did, a person
could develop and test an application on 2.4.21, ship it, then
find that it fails on millions of 2.4.17 machines.
-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:21 EST