Re: bandwidth 'depredation'

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz)
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 02:26:34 EST

Next message: Kristian Peters: "Re: bandwidth 'depredation'"
Previous message: Hua Zhong: "dirty buffers and umount/remount"
In reply to: DervishD: "bandwidth 'depredation'"
Next in thread: Kristian Peters: "Re: bandwidth 'depredation'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, DervishD wrote:

> IMHO, the IP layer (well, in this case the TCP layer) should
> distribute the bandwidth (although I don't know how to do this), and
> the kernel seems to be not doing it.
>
> I don't know if this is the intended behaviour or even if this is
> a kernel fault or not, but I think that is not good ;)

QoS (CONFIG_NET_SCHED)?

-- http://function.linuxpower.ca

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kristian Peters: "Re: bandwidth 'depredation'"
Previous message: Hua Zhong: "dirty buffers and umount/remount"
In reply to: DervishD: "bandwidth 'depredation'"
Next in thread: Kristian Peters: "Re: bandwidth 'depredation'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:21 EST