Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 03:26:37 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 - list.h cleanup"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:33:18AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 6. In esp. ARM seems to be much better off with GCC 3.1 then anything else.

Not yet proven. Only a minority of people are using gcc 3.1 compared
to gcc 2.95.x to build ARM kernels currently.

We've already found a few things that need changing in 2.5 (which haven't
been updated in 2.4 yet) that are needed for gcc 3.1 to build the kernel
properly.

-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 - list.h cleanup"
Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch"
In reply to: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19"
Next in thread: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19"
Reply: Martin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:21 EST