Użytkownik Russell King napisał:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
>>Użytkownik Russell King napisał:
>>
>>>GCC 3.x introduces the dodgy practice of removing the frame pointer
>>>from every function despite telling the compiler not to with
>>>-fno-omit-frame-pointer. It's also contary to the GCC documentation
>>>when it interferes with debugging.
>>
>>This can not be true - since otherwise task switching wouldn't work
>>at all!
>
>
> It is indeed true. From your comment, it looks like you don't understand
> the ARM architecture/what a frame pointer is.
Well I surely understand what a pointer to the local variable set is.
I know pascal and gdb well enough :-). However what I may have
missed is that ARM is using some other task switch mechanism.
I would be courious to see what it is?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST