Re: 2.5.21: kbuild changes broke filenames with commas

From: Thunder from the hill (thunder@ngforever.de)
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 07:16:10 EST


Hi

On Tue 11 Jun 2002 Russell King wrote:
> On Tue Jun 11 2002 at 05:11:13AM -0600 Thunder from the hill wrote:
> > Think big! Think about __future__.
>
> The path to overdesign and excessive featurebloat.

Well the question is then how will things look without commas? I suppose
if we have very complex things and prevent using commas whereas I don't
assert that we do for text but this is just a bloat example it's good to
have things like commas allowed even though we are in case we won't allow
them there talking about file names.

If we allow commas all over the filesystem and likewise say that there is
nothing to mention about it why should we refuse them for kbuild
especially since there is a parallel system which allows commas?

Regards
Thunder

-- 
German attitude becoming        |	Thunder from the hill at ngforever
rightaway popular:		|
       "Get outa my way  	|	free inhabitant not directly
    for I got a mobile phone!"	|	belonging anywhere

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST