On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 12:29, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> I'm sorry it sounds like NTFS code needs rework, not Rusty's patch.
> Feel free to enlighten me why I am wrong.
Uh no. We have both static (NR_CPUS) and dynamic (smp_num_cpus) code in
the kernel... both are legit for different purposes.
This patch takes Anton's code and swaps a kmalloc based on smp_num_cpus
to NR_CPUS. I.e., on my 2-way machine I use 16x more memory.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:23 EST