Re: [patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 17:31:37 EST

Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17"
Previous message: Robbert Kouprie: "The buggy APIC of the Abit BP6"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Scheduler Bug (set_cpus_allowed)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yikes!!! I just noticed a problem.

You can't just delete prepare_to_switch(), that is where we do
the register window flush on Sparc and it has the be at that
exact location.

Can you redo your diffs, preserving prepare_to_switch()?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: [CHECKER] 37 stack variables >= 1K in 2.4.17"
Previous message: Robbert Kouprie: "The buggy APIC of the Abit BP6"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] switch_mm()'s desire to run without the rq lock"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: Scheduler Bug (set_cpus_allowed)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST