begin David S. Miller quotation on Thu, 13 Jun 2002 21:32:11 -0700:
> From: Robert Love <rml@mvista.com>
> Date: 13 Jun 2002 12:21:58 -0700
>
> Patch is against 2.4.19-pre10-ac2, please apply.
>
> Ummm what is with all of those switch_mm() hacks? Is this an attempt to
> work around the locking problems? Please don't do that as it is going
> to kill performance and having ifdef sparc64 sched.c changes is ugly to
> say the least.
>
> Ingo posted the correct fix to the locking problem with the patch he
> posted the other day, that is what should go into the -ac patches.
This part of the patch (the change to kernel/sched.c) can be safely
removed without making o1 stop working.
This hack (conservatively) fixes an issue where on bootup, the machine
would get into a page fault loop and hang. This only happens a very
small percentage of the time. I will investigate whether the patch
Ingo put out fixes this issue.
-tduffy
-- He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. -- Thomas Jefferson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 15 2002 - 22:00:32 EST