On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 16:57, Robert Love wrote:
> Another case of 2.4-ac being right
Attached patch brings over the sane bits from 2.4-ac: i.e. if Linus
merges this and Alan merges your patch minus my complaints, the two
trees will be in sync...
Robert Love
diff -urN linux-2.5.21/kernel/sched.c linux/kernel/sched.c
--- linux-2.5.21/kernel/sched.c Sat Jun 8 22:28:13 2002
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c Sun Jun 16 17:14:31 2002
@@ -762,8 +762,8 @@
list_t *queue;
int idx;
- if (unlikely(in_interrupt()))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
+
#if CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM
check_highmem_ptes();
#endif
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@
/*
* Valid priorities for SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR are
- * 1..MAX_USER_RT_PRIO, valid priority for SCHED_OTHER is 0.
+ * 1..MAX_USER_RT_PRIO-1, valid priority for SCHED_OTHER is 0.
*/
retval = -EINVAL;
if (lp.sched_priority < 0 || lp.sched_priority > MAX_USER_RT_PRIO-1)
@@ -1710,15 +1710,15 @@
sigfillset(¤t->blocked);
set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
/*
- * The first migration thread is started on CPU #0. This one can migrate
- * the other migration threads to their destination CPUs.
+ * The first migration thread is started on CPU #0. This one can
+ * migrate the other migration threads to their destination CPUs.
*/
if (cpu != 0) {
while (!cpu_rq(cpu_logical_map(0))->migration_thread)
yield();
set_cpus_allowed(current, 1UL << cpu);
}
- printk("migration_task %d on cpu=%d\n",cpu,smp_processor_id());
+ printk("migration_task %d on cpu=%d\n", cpu, smp_processor_id());
ret = setscheduler(0, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
rq = this_rq();
@@ -1790,4 +1790,4 @@
while (!cpu_rq(cpu_logical_map(cpu))->migration_thread)
schedule_timeout(2);
}
-#endif
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 22:00:12 EST