On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > 2.5.23-rmap (this patch -- "rmap-minimal"):
> > > Total kernel swapouts during test = 24068 kB
> > > Total kernel swapins during test = 6480 kB
> > > Elapsed time for test: 133 seconds
> > >
> > > 2.5.23-rmap13b (Rik's "rmap-13b complete") :
> > > Total kernel swapouts during test = 40696 kB
> > > Total kernel swapins during test = 380 kB
> > > Elapsed time for test: 133 seconds
> You might conclude from the above that the lru+rmap is superior to
> aging+rmap: while they show the same wall-clock time, lru+rmap consumes
> considerably less disk bandwidth. Naturally, it would be premature to
> conclude this from one trial on one load.
On the contrary, aging+rmap shows a lot less swapins.
The fact that it has more swapouts than needed means
we need to fix one aspect of the thing (page_launder),
it doesn't mean we should get rid of the whole thing.
kind regards,
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 22:00:19 EST