Re: Oops on 2.5.23 and IDE

• Next message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: another sched.c error with athlon"
• Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH+discussion] symlink recursion"
• In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Oops on 2.5.23 and IDE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jun 19 2002, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> IDE seems to be doing odd things.
>
> >>EIP; c0117318 <schedule+28/4f0> <=====
> Trace; c0117c6a <wait_for_completion+11a/1d0>
> Trace; c0117820 <default_wake_function+0/40>
> Trace; c0117820 <default_wake_function+0/40>
> Trace; c022e1ae <ide_do_drive_cmd+18e/1b0>
> Trace; c01bc082 <vsnprintf+2a2/420>
> Trace; c022e439 <ide_raw_taskfile+59/60>
> Trace; c02302f4 <do_recalibrate+54/70>
> Trace; c022e1d0 <special_intr+0/210>
> Trace; c0234e75 <ide_dma_intr+115/120>
> Trace; c0231138 <ata_irq_request+148/230>
> Trace; c0234d60 <ide_dma_intr+0/120>
>
>
> int ide_do_drive_cmd()
> {
> [...]
> if (action == ide_wait) {
> wait_for_completion(&wait); /* wait for it to be serviced */
> return rq->errors ? -EIO : 0; /* return -EIO if errors */
> }
> [...]
> }
>
> Was that function really designed to be called from interrupt context?

With action other than ide_wait sure, using ide_wait of course not.

-- 
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: another sched.c error with athlon"
• Previous message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH+discussion] symlink recursion"
• In reply to: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Oops on 2.5.23 and IDE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 22:00:20 EST