Alan Cox wrote:
>>The 2.2.21 kernel was behaving incorrectly for SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR
>>scheduling.
>
>
> Looks fine but I dont want to apply behaviour changing non critical stuff
> to 2.2
Oh, no!
What's going on with the kernel community? I posted a similar fix for
the 2.4.18 kernel, and it hasn't been picked up there either.
For the 2.4.18 kernel scheduler, our 86 process application (SCHED_FIFO,
priorities 7-23, System V semaphores for priority preemption) won't even
stay up without my patch.
The 2.2.21 SCHED_FIFO behaviour is correct but slightly inefficient,
while the SCHED_RR behaviour is plain broken. What is an application
that depends on correct SCHED_RR behaviour to do in that case? There are
applications where increased latencies as a result of SCHED_RR being
broken are unacceptable.
-- Bhavesh P. Davda Avaya Inc Room B3-B03 E-mail : bhavesh@avaya.com 1300 West 120th Avenue Phone : (303) 538-4438 Westminster, CO 80234 Fax : (303) 538-3155- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST