Re: [2.5.19] Oops during PCI scan on Alpha

From: Jan-Benedict Glaw (jbglaw@lug-owl.de)
Date: Sun Jun 23 2002 - 12:03:30 EST

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 2002-06-04 08:50:11 -0700, Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
wrote in message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206040821100.654-100000@geena.pdx.osdl.net>:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 14:27:27 +1000

[Order of grouped init calls]

> early_arch
> mem
> subsys
> arch
> fs
> device
> late

Just a dumb ass question: We're currently dealing with grouped init
calls. Why don't we simply give them numbers like we do in
/etc/rc<X>.d/S<YZ>startme.sh? That would possibly give an easier
mechanism of keeping all those init calls in a sane order!?

MfG, JBG

-- Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 -- New APT-Proxy written in shell script -- http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [Lse-tech] Re: ext3 performance bottleneck as the number of spindles gets large"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 22:00:27 EST