Re: [PATCH] Initcall depends

From: Ingo Oeser (ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de)
Date: Tue Jun 18 2002 - 05:55:54 EST

Next message: Dave Hansen: "Re: acenic >4gig sendfile problem"
Previous message: Joel Jaeggli: "Re: System hang with heavy network traffic using rtl8139c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:17:10AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Then again, there's also the possibility of completing initramsfs, making
> > it mandatory, compiling things always as modules and leaving it to
> > "depmod" in initramfs to do the right thing.
>
> If that ever happens... 8)

Until there is now way to remove init sections from modules, that
approach is pretty pointless anyway and will hopefully not
adapted to be mandatory.

Regards

Ingo Oeser

-- 
Science is what we can tell a computer. Art is everything else. --- D.E.Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dave Hansen: "Re: acenic >4gig sendfile problem"
Previous message: Joel Jaeggli: "Re: System hang with heavy network traffic using rtl8139c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 22:00:09 EST