Re: driverfs is not for everything! (was: [PATCH] /proc/scsi/map )

From: Adam J. Richter (adam@yggdrasil.com)
Date: Tue Jun 25 2002 - 14:50:18 EST


>> = ???
> = Patrick Mochel
>> I think the qualification for appearing in driverfs is actually possessing a
>> driver. Therefore, we accept FC and iSCSI. Things which appear as
>> FileSystems are debatable, but not anything which has a real device driver.
>
>The qualification for appearing in the device tree is the physical
>presence of the device, regardless of the presence of a driver to control
>it. (This typically depends on the presence of the bus driver so it can
>discover the device.) Presence in the device tree implies presence in
>driverfs.

        Lots of "soft" drivers, from /dev/lop to FC and iSCSI could
be simplified by using the struct device <--> struct device_driver
rendezvous code. Under Patrick's propoposed, policy, we would not be
able to get the simplifications in scsi.c, usb.c, or anything else that
could possibly drive a device that was too "soft" for Patrick.

        It is also important for supporting hot plugging that user level
facilities understand that if ide disk #7 was removed that that
poisons /dev/loop/7.

Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
                         "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 22:00:10 EST