Alexandre P. Nunes wrote:
>> That would be nice... but no -
>>
>> both -aa and -ac have it though, and it seems
>> solid, so maybe there's hope for 2.4 mainline
>> getting it eventually.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>
> I said "not perfect" because a rather non-important benchmarking
> called quake 3 seens a lot worse in pre10-ac2 with preemptive patches
> when compared against -pre10 with preemptive patches: sound and screen
> popped sometimes, like if there was a background task borrowing some
> cpu, which was not the case, I mean, no other background tasks
> compared with testing against -pre10. That was the only exception to
> the above paragraph that I can remember of.
I am running -pre10-ac2 on one box - but also
the preemptive patch - are you running that?
On another box, I'm running -pre10aa4, which
also includes the low latency mini patch.
I also follow the q3a benchmark closely, and
RtCW as well. (The enemy is weakened!)
-ac + preempt and -aa both seem OK here, but
I prefer -aa since I use tux.
Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 22:00:12 EST