Re: Status of capabilities?

From: Chris Wright (chris@wirex.com)
Date: Thu Jun 27 2002 - 15:54:22 EST

Next message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: 2.4.19-rc1 proc_get_inode Unresolved in /net/wan/comx.o"
Previous message: Wayne Whitney: "Re: another way to activate AMD disconnect on VIA KT266 (aka cooling bits)"
In reply to: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Status of capabilities?"
Next in thread: Dax Kelson: "Re: Status of capabilities?"
Reply: Dax Kelson: "Re: Status of capabilities?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Jesse Pollard (pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil) wrote:
>
> Actually, I think most of that work has already been done by the Linux
> Security Module project (well, except #7).

The LSM project supports capabilities exactly as it appears in the
kernel right now. The EA linkage is still missing. Of course, we are
accepting patches ;-)

thanks,
-chris

-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Willy Tarreau: "Re: 2.4.19-rc1 proc_get_inode Unresolved in /net/wan/comx.o"
Previous message: Wayne Whitney: "Re: another way to activate AMD disconnect on VIA KT266 (aka cooling bits)"
In reply to: Jesse Pollard: "Re: Status of capabilities?"
Next in thread: Dax Kelson: "Re: Status of capabilities?"
Reply: Dax Kelson: "Re: Status of capabilities?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 30 2002 - 22:00:12 EST