Re: close return value (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ext3 vs Reiserfs benchmarks)

From: Elladan (elladan@eskimo.com)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 17:07:27 EST


On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:43:57PM +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <20020717164933.GA2136@eskimo.com>,
> Elladan <elladan@eskimo.com> wrote:
> >
> >Consider what this says, if a particular OS doesn't pick a standard
> >which the application can port to. It means that the *only way* to
> >correctly close a file descriptor is like this:
> >
> >int ret;
> >do {
> > ret = close(fd);
> >} while(ret == -1 && errno != EBADF);
>
> NO.
>
> The above is
> (a) not portable
> (b) not current practice
>
> The "not portable" part comes from the fact that (as somebody pointed
> out), a threaded environment in which the kernel _does_ close the FD on
> errors, the FD may have been validly re-used (by the kernel) for some
> other thread, and closing the FD a second time is a BUG.

That somebody was me. It appears we're in extremely violent agreement
on this issue. We both agree the code I wrote is crap. :-)

-J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:24 EST