Re: 2.4.19-rc2 compile fail

From: J.A. Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 17:18:37 EST

On 2002.07.17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
>
>> GCC version is 3.1 .config is attached, fairly large as I base it off of
>> the original Red Hat one to make sure everything compiles, even though I
>> am not using most of it. Strangely no compile problems on my base 7.2 box
>> (gcc 2.96). .config is attached.
>
>The short answer ist perhaps: 3.1 is not a supported compiler...
>
>But I'm surprised that I wasn't able to reproduce it using the 20020703
>(past 3.1) snapshot of the gcc-3.1 branch that is in Debian unstable.
>

I am building kernels with Mandrakes gcc-3.1.1 snapshots since time ago,
and have no problems with it (now gcc-3.1.1-0.7mdk, branch of 2002/07/01)

Probably kernel is more sensible to binutils version...
Here: binutils-2.12.90.0.14-2mdk 

-- 
J.A. Magallon             \   Software is like sex: It's better when it's free
mailto:jamagallon@able.es  \                    -- Linus Torvalds, FSF T-shirt
Linux werewolf 2.4.19-rc1-jam3, Mandrake Linux 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 (Mandrake Linux 8.3 3.1.1-0.7mdk)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:24 EST