At 07:56 18/07/02, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>Well, I also like the non C99 variant that is in gcc as well, but if gcc is
>>going to drop that in the future in favour of the C99 standard... But yes,
>>not having the spacing is _ugly_, what I'm doing is:
>>static struct proto_ops SOCKOPS_WRAPPED(atalk_dgram_ops) = {
>> .family = PF_APPLETALK,
>> .release = atalk_release,
>> .bind = atalk_bind,
>> .connect = atalk_connect,
>> .socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
>> .accept = sock_no_accept,
>
>Agreed, that's the way to do it.
Yes, the patch for ntfs that just found its way into my inbox is _really_
ugly... Something like the above would be much nicer.
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST