Re: [RFC] new module format

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Fri Jul 19 2002 - 23:13:46 EST

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] check shm mount succeeded in shmem_file_setup"
Previous message: Gabor Kerenyi: "Re: [patch 2/9] 2.5.6 lm_sensors"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [RFC] new module format"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207191128030.28515-100000@serv> you write:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > I've started updating my in-kernel module loader patches for 2.5.26.
> > I'll send you a mail when it's done.
>
> The more I think about it, the more I like the idea to go into the other
> direction. Most of the module information (e.g. symbols, dependencies)
> stored in the kernel can be as well managed in userspace.

You might be right. All kinds of things can be pushed into userspace:
code will tell.

Cheers!
Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: [PATCH] check shm mount succeeded in shmem_file_setup"
Previous message: Gabor Kerenyi: "Re: [patch 2/9] 2.5.6 lm_sensors"
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [RFC] new module format"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST