On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 01:57, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
>
> > > o EVMS (Enterprise Volume Management System) (EVMS team)
> >
> > or LVM2, which already appears to be scrubbed down and clean
>
> Is there any reason why not both can go in? As far as I know neither
> of them needs much of core changes, they are more like independent "drivers"
> of the generic block layer stacking interface. There are already multiple
> drivers of this - LVM and the various MD personalities.
I wholly agree. I had a couple of emails about my 2 cents..and
well..that's what it seems is the logical choice, but development time
to do such a thing seems to be the bottleneck, if there is one.
...
>
> -Andi
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Austin Gonyou <austin@digitalroadkill.net> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:34 EST