Re: still having smp/snat problems (Re: Linux 2.4.19-rc3)

From: Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Date: Sun Jul 21 2002 - 20:43:01 EST


On Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:17:01 -0400
glynis@butterfly.hjsoft.com wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:20:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (02/07/17 1.630)
> > [PATCH] The real netfilter conntrack SMP overrun fix
>
> assuming this should have fixed this:
> LIST_DELETE: ip_conntrack_core.c:165
> `&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY]'(dd8f2e90) not in &ip_conntrack_hash
> [hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple)].

Nope, that's the mysterious half-deleted bug.

> Gnu C gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 20020703 (Debian prerelease) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

And it's always associated with a wierd compiler version like this.

1) Does this happen reliably enough for you to decide whether something
   fixes it?
2) If so, please try dropping compiler versions.

Rusty.

-- 
   there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
   many doers quoting their contemporaries.  -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:37 EST