Hi,
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Oh, I have thought about it. I'm in no way defending Martin (he's a big
> boy, can do that by himself) or saying everything's fine. I merely
> objected to the content and presentation of the posts I replied to.
Thing is: if the people think that it actually _is_ good that Martin is
the "Linux 2.5 IDE guy", he's got nothing to fear. All I wanted is to
summon a bit of a discussion about several issues that are not okay in any
way. It's like with the code itself: either bugs get resolved, or the code
must be pulled. Of course I guess it'd be cool if the bugs could get
fixed.
Regards,
Thunder
-- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:37 EST