Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@lst.de)
Date: Mon Jul 22 2002 - 08:26:46 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:23:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i agree mostly, but i do not agree with __irq_save() and irq_save().
> What's wrong with "flags_t irq_save_off()" - the name carries the proper
> meaning, and it also harmonizes with irq_off().

but not with irq_restore :) maybe irq_restore_on() although the on
is implicit.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [patch] cli()/sti() cleanup, 2.5.27-A2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:38 EST