On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:38:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > but not with irq_restore :) maybe irq_restore_on() although the on is
> > implicit.
>
> think about it - if this was true then irq_restore_on() would be
> equivalent to irq_on().
yupp, you're right. could you take the prototype changes anyway?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:38 EST