Re: [PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2

From: Jeff Dike (jdike@karaya.com)
Date: Mon Jul 22 2002 - 15:02:41 EST


hch@infradead.org said:
> The fastcall definition should go into an asm/ header instead of such
> hacks..

And I'm supposed to fix this as part of the UML patch?

> the disk accounting stuff is also bogus - instead of wasting ram with
> huge array it should rather be dynamically-allocated in a per-disk
> structure..

And this too?

                                Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:40 EST