On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
> > With this, I'm assuming 2.5.27 has IDE 100 in it, patched up from IDE
> > 99. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Hi,
You are wrong. ;-)
IDE patches are incremetnal, IDE 100 is incremental to IDE 99.
Both are in 2.5.27.
> Introducing a bug in 99 doesn't mean it has to be fixed in 100. However,
> it might be. Martin, could you please tell us more about it?
It IS NOT. IDE 100 is a trivia patch indendation + initializers etc.
>
> BTW, where did we end up? We don't even know the current IDE state...
>
> Regards,
> Thunder
> --
> (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode)
> ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$
> N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G
> e++++ h* r--- y-
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:41 EST