Linux Device Driver Development Tool Kit

From: Marcin Stepnicki (aragorn@vlo.ids.gda.pl)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 11:55:10 EST

Next message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"
Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "[PATCH] DocBook Makefile&Friends cleanup"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Linux Device Driver Development Tool Kit"
Reply: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Linux Device Driver Development Tool Kit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'd like to ask about http://www.jungo.com/linux.html. Do you consider
this tool "acceptable"? Do you think it is worth mentioning to
companies releasing new hardware if they don't want to make their
drivers not only open-source, but simply available (as long as Linux is
concerned)?

Please cc: me as I'm not subscribed.

Thank you for your time

-- 
*-- Holden / Vime *-- aragorn@vime.prv.pl *--
*-- gg: 1767160  *-- http://www.vime.prv.pl *--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"
Previous message: Sam Ravnborg: "[PATCH] DocBook Makefile&Friends cleanup"
Next in thread: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Linux Device Driver Development Tool Kit"
Reply: Anton Altaparmakov: "Re: Linux Device Driver Development Tool Kit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 22:00:44 EST