alan@redhat.com said:
> Which would argue UML ought to have a positively microkernel view of
> syscalls - sending a message ?
Indeed. Ingo's mail got me thinking that
alan@redhat.com said:
> the alternatives like a seperate process and ptrace are not pretty either
might not be so bad after all.
All I would need to make this work is for one process to be able to change
the mm of another.
Then, the current UML tracing thread would handle the kernel side of things
and sit in its own address space nicely protected from its processes.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:21 EST