Rik van Riel wrote:
>On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>
>
>>On Sunday 04 August 2002 13:30, Hans Reiser wrote:
>>
>>
>>>How do you ensure that caches have their (internal) aging hands pushed
>>>at a speed that is proportional to their memory usage, or is your design
>>>susceptible to all the usual complaints the unified memory manager crowd
>>>has about separate caches?
>>>
>>>
>>That's a policy/optimization issue; it's not even desirable to shrink the
>>caches with priorities proportional to their size---they would all tend to
>>become equally large.
>>
>>
>
>Nope, the idea is to push all caches according to size, but
>often-used caches should shrink less than caches that are
>hardly ever used.
>
Do you let the subcache decide how to move the aging hand and track it?
Have I convinced you of that one yet? Or is it still page based?
-- Hans- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:25 EST