Re: [PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)

• Next message: Jean Tourrilhes: "Re: Linux 2.4.19-ac4"
• Previous message: Chris Mason: "[PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• In reply to: Chris Mason: "[PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: [PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• Reply: Chris Mason: "Re: [PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 01:34:53PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Below are just the hunks that change VFS code, against 2.4.19-final.
> The reiserfs bits will come once this gets accepted. Please review and
> throw something blunt at me if you don't want this in the kernel.

Could you please get that tested in 2.5 or -ac first?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Jean Tourrilhes: "Re: Linux 2.4.19-ac4"
• Previous message: Chris Mason: "[PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• In reply to: Chris Mason: "[PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• Next in thread: Chris Mason: "Re: [PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• Reply: Chris Mason: "Re: [PATCH] write_super is not for syncing (take 3)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:28 EST