Re: context switch vs. signal delivery [was: Re: Accelerating user mode

From: Jeff Dike (jdike@karaya.com)
Date: Mon Aug 05 2002 - 19:49:04 EST

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[PATCH] NUMA-Q relocate early ioremap"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: Fragment flooding in 2.4.x/2.5.x"
In reply to: Martin Waitz: "Re: context switch vs. signal delivery [was: Re: Accelerating user mode"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: context switch vs. signal delivery [was: Re: Accelerating user mode linux]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

tali@admingilde.org said:
> there is already a group at our university doing that: http://
> www3.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Research/Projects/UMLinux/umlinux.html

Yeah, I know. Hans-Joerg and I have been talking about whether and how
much it makes sense to start sharing code.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[PATCH] NUMA-Q relocate early ioremap"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: Fragment flooding in 2.4.x/2.5.x"
In reply to: Martin Waitz: "Re: context switch vs. signal delivery [was: Re: Accelerating user mode"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: context switch vs. signal delivery [was: Re: Accelerating user mode linux]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:29 EST