Could this be a problem with my chipset (Via)? I'm on an Abit VP6
motherboard. I'm actually suprised I haven't had problems with ide in
2.4.19 (the hpt controller and via).
Below is the usb stuff from lspci -v:
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00
[UHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 12
I/O ports at d400 [size=32]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00
[UHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 12
I/O ports at d800 [size=32]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 07:02:22 +1000
tyler
Brad Hards <bhards@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 02:56, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 12:00:55AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> > > Greg: I think this was one of your patches, associated with the
> > > HIDINPUT patch. It looks like the return value is wrong. See
> > > below.
> > >
> > > --- include/linux/hiddev.h.orig Mon Aug 5 23:19:54 2002
> > > +++ include/linux/hiddev.h Mon Aug 5 23:56:34 2002
> > > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
> > > int __init hiddev_init(void);
> > > void __exit hiddev_exit(void);
> > > #else
> > > -static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid) {
> > > return NULL; } +static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct
> > > hid_device *hid) { return -1; } static inline void
> > > hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *hid){ } static inline void
> > > hiddev_hid_event(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int usage, int
> > > value) { } static inline int hiddev_init(void) { return 0;}
> >
> > ??? Why return -1 as a void *?
> >
> > The only caller of hiddev_connect is:
> > if (!hiddev_connect(hid))
> > hid->claimed |= HID_CLAIMED_HIDDEV;
> >
> > Hm, seems like you don't want a void * there at all, but a int,
> > right?
> I assume so.
>
> > But that doesn't explain the error people are having with the code
> > compiled in.
> No - while doing the investigation, I noted that dmesg was showing
> input0,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [045e:001d] on usb2:3.0
> input1,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Pointer [045e:001d] on usb2:3.1
> input2,hiddev0: USB HID v1.00 Mouse [Logitech USB-PS/2 Mouse M-BA47]
> on usb2:4.0
>
> with CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV turned off.
>
> So I chased that down to the above conclusion.
>
> But I still don't see the problem, and can't duplicate it.
>
> Brad
> - --
> http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in
> Black.-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE9TufiW6pHgIdAuOMRAojFAKCmSOjjTwcp6z7tPKeR6kaokAF71wCginFW
> 5/94epXIyAJlfpFGtmQqxOY=
> =Ywrd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST