Re: 2.4.19-ac4 IRQ messup?

From: Willy Tarreau (willy@w.ods.org)
Date: Tue Aug 06 2002 - 05:01:01 EST


On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Thomas Mierau wrote:
> Thanks,
> I looked it up its called watchdog (what else). It was set to 5000ms and I
> changed it to 300ms. But the result is : no change!

by "no change", you mean "still loss of 5s" ?
If this is the case, are you sure the switch port you are connected to is
in full duplex too ? does it detect receive errors or carrier lost ? I
believe that cisco switches in "spanning tree portfast" mode block the port
during 5s after a renegociation. It's easy to detect because the port's led
becomes orange.

perhaps you can switch the 2 NIC's cables to check if the problem follows the
cable or the NIC.

else I have no other clue ...

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:30 EST