Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration

From: Martin J. Bligh (Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue Aug 06 2002 - 08:47:23 EST

Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Warn users about machines with non-working WP bit"
Previous message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: IPC lock patch performance improvement"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> This patch is from Matt Dobson. It corrects the definition of
>> xquad_portio, getting rid of a compile warning.
>
> Marcelo - I have a much cleaner change for this.

Can you publish it? ;-)

Thanks,

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Warn users about machines with non-working WP bit"
Previous message: Hugh Dickins: "Re: IPC lock patch performance improvement"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] NUMA-Q xquad_portio declaration"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST