On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Patricia Gaughen wrote:
>
> Please consider this patch for inclusion into the 2.4.20pre tree.
> It was accepted into the 2.4.19pre6aa1, with slight modifications
> by Andrea that I have incorporated those changes into my patch.
> This patch, along with the modularization of setup_arch, and the
> {node,zone}_start_paddr to {node,zone}_start_pfn change, are the
> patches that my i386 discontigmem patch depends on.
>
> This patch restructures mem_init() for i386 to make it easier to
> include the i386 numa changes (for CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM) I've been
> working on. It also makes mem_init() easier to read.
>
> This patch does not depend on the other patches I'm submitting today, but
> my discontigmem patch does depend on this one.
>
> I've tested this patch on the following configurations: UP, SMP, SMP PAE,
> multiquad, multiquad PAE, multiquad DISCONTIGMEM, multiquad DISCONTIGMEM PAE.
>
> Any and all feedback regarding this patch is greatly appreciated.
It looks ok but what about surrounding init_one_highpage with
CONFIG_HIGHMEM?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:31 EST