Alan Cox wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 09:58, Zeuner, Axel wrote:
> > I would expect, that changes of the parent of one member of the thread group
> > do not affect the interactions between the members of the group.
> > Corrections are welcome.
> > (Please cc mails to me, I read only the archives of the
> > linux-kernel list.)
>
> I agree with your diagnosis I'm not convinced by your change. The thread
> groups are only used by NGPT not by glibc pthreads while the problem is
> true across both.
Have the glibc folks decided NOT to move to thread groups?
I sort of expected that they were just taking their time,
but would eventually move.
-g
>
> Possibly the right fix is to remove the reparent to init increment of
> self_exec_id and instead explicitly check process 1 in the signal paths.
>
> Opinions ?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:32 EST