>On Tue, Aug 06 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > >...
> > > try a work load that excercises the block i/o layer alone (O_DIRECT,
> > > raw, whatnot) and then compare 2.4 and 2.5. ibm had some slides on
this
> > > from ols, unfortunately I don't know if they have then online.
> >...
> >
> > Pages 390-406 in
> >
> > http://www.linux.org.uk/~ajh/ols2002_proceedings.pdf.gz
> >
> > or are you talking about something different?
> Right thanks, exactly those. Table 3 on page 395 is the one I noted.
> Forget readv, as that hasn't been done in 2.5 yet. I'd say a 2.5.17
> untweaked kernel beating 2.4 tweaked beyond recognition isn't too shabby
> for a devel series kernel.
The corresponding presentation in the sdd format is available at
http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linuxperf/.
Regards,
Peter
Peter Wai Yee Wong
IBM Linux Technology Center, Performance Analysis
email: wpeter@us.ibm.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:33 EST