Re: Why 'mrproper'?

• Next message: Marcus Sundberg: "Re: NAPI (was Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre1)"
• Previous message: Dave Gilbert (Home): "file handles - who ate them?!"
• In reply to: Chris Chabot: "Re: Why 'mrproper'?"
• Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Why 'mrproper'?"
• Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Why 'mrproper'?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wednesday 07 August 2002 15:18, Chris Chabot wrote:
> It was named such at the time, as a 'cleaning agent' comparible to 'Mr
> Muscle', etc.. Thus mrproper _realy_ cleans the kernel tree ;-)

LOL. And to add to this, here in Belgium where I live, we have a product that
is actually called 'Mr. Proper' and it is a cleaning agent.

DK

-- 
Oh, when I was in love with you,
	Then I was clean and brave,
And miles around the wonder grew
	How well did I behave.
And now the fancy passes by,
	And nothing will remain,
And miles around they'll say that I
	Am quite myself again.
		-- A. E. Housman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Marcus Sundberg: "Re: NAPI (was Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre1)"
• Previous message: Dave Gilbert (Home): "file handles - who ate them?!"
• In reply to: Chris Chabot: "Re: Why 'mrproper'?"
• Next in thread: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Why 'mrproper'?"
• Reply: Thunder from the hill: "Re: Why 'mrproper'?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:36 EST