Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Wed Aug 07 2002 - 17:19:21 EST

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] Rmap speedup"
Previous message: Jesse Barnes: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
In reply to: Jesse Barnes: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > macro worked before? I could just remove all those checks in the scsi
> > > code I guess.
> >
> > That would be a better option.
>
> Does this look a little better? Thanks for checking it out.

Looks good to me. Would be even better if you removed MUST_NOT_HOLD ;)

regards,

Rik

-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] Rmap speedup"
Previous message: Jesse Barnes: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
In reply to: Jesse Barnes: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Next in thread: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 07 2002 - 22:00:38 EST